<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mercedespedia.org &#187; mercedes advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mercedespedia.org/tag/mercedes-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mercedespedia.org</link>
	<description>Mercedes Benz News, Car Reviews, Videos, Articles and Pictures</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:45:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Mercedes Misleading in their Advertising?</title>
		<link>http://www.mercedespedia.org/is-mercedes-misleading-in-their-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mercedespedia.org/is-mercedes-misleading-in-their-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 e-class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercedes advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercedes e-class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mercedespedia.org/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mercedes recently came under fire for a print E-Class campaign. The content of said ad features the E-Class sedan and states that CO2  emissions for the range are down to 139g/km*, which means its better for the environment.  It also means you pay less tax.  And theres something else that&#8217;s lower than you&#8217;d expected as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mercedes recently came under fire for a print E-Class campaign.<span id="more-275"></span> The content of said ad features the E-Class sedan and states that <em>CO2  emissions for the range are down to 139g/km*, which means its better for the environment.  It also means you pay less tax.  And theres something else that&#8217;s lower than you&#8217;d expected as well.  The price.&#8221;  The asterisk linked to a footnote which stated &#8220;CO2 emissions: 139-261/km &#8230; Based on E250 CDI SE manual available at launch.  Model shown is a Mercedes-Benz E250 CDI Sport.</em></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-276" title="500x_Mercedes_Benz_E_Class" src="http://www.mercedespedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/500x_Mercedes_Benz_E_Class.jpg" alt="500x_Mercedes_Benz_E_Class" width="500" height="299" /></p>
<p><em>The root of the problem seems more to do with the occasional vagueness of the English language more than in any outright lie. The Mercedes ad states &#8220;CO2  emissions for the range are down to 139g/km*, which means its better for the environment.&#8221; The asterisk points out this only applies to the E-Class sedan with a small diesel engine and manual transmission, as the range for C02 emissions actually goes up to 261 g/km with different configurations. Out of 24 possible engine/wheel/transmission/bodystyle possibilities only two were as low as 139 g/km.</em></p>
<p><em>According to ASA, &#8220;We concluded that the body copy of the  ad misleadingly implied that the  whole E-Class Saloon range had emissions of 139 g/kg or similar and the claim was likely to mislead.&#8221;</em> The print ad has been discontinued throughout UK papers/magazines.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://jalopnik.com/5372844/did-this-uk-mercedes-ad-cross-the-line">Jalopnik</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mercedespedia.org/is-mercedes-misleading-in-their-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

